<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michelsen, H. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liu, Fengshan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kock, Boris F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bladh, H.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A. Boiarciuc</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Charwath, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dreier, T.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hadef, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hofmann, Max</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J. Reimann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Will, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Per-Erik Bengtsson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Henning Bockhorn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">F. Foucher</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Geigle, Klaus Peter</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">C. Mounaïm-Rousselle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">C. Schulz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R. Stirn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B. Tribalet</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rainer Suntz</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Modeling laser-induced incandescence of soot: A summary and comparison of LII models</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applied Physics B</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">87</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">503-521</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!--StartFragment--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Times;
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US&quot;&gt;We have performed a comparison of ten models that predict the temporal behavior of laser-induced incandescence (LII) of soot.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;In this paper we present a summary of the models and comparisons of calculated temperatures, diameters, signals, and energy-balance terms.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun:
yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;The models were run assuming laser heating at 532 nm at fluences of 0.05 and 0.70 J/cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; with a laser temporal profile provided.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Calculations were performed for a single primary particle with a diameter of 30 nm at an ambient temperature of 1800 K and pressure of 1 bar.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun:
yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Preliminary calculations were performed with a fully constrained model.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;The comparison of unconstrained models demonstrates a wide spread in calculated LII signals.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Many of the differences can be attributed to the values of a few important parameters, such as the refractive index function &lt;i&gt;E&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Times;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US&quot;&gt;(&lt;i&gt;m&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Times;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:
EN-US&quot;&gt;) and thermal and mass accommodation coefficients.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Constraining these parameters brings most of the models into much better agreement with each other, particularly for the low-fluence case.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Agreement among models is not as good for the high-fluence case, even when selected parameters are constrained.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;The reason for greater variability in model results at high fluence appears to be related to solution approaches to mass and heat loss by sublimation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!--EndFragment--&gt;</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">503</style></section></record></records></xml>